Cited by 56Amphibian and Reptile BiologyEcology and biodiversity studiesFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of bison wallows by anurans on Konza Prairie.

GERLANC, NICOLE M., KAUFMAN, GLENNIS A.·2003·The American Midland Naturalist

Abstract

Historically, bison were of great importance to the grassland ecosystem, affecting plants and other organisms directly through grazing and indirectly by creating soil disturbances, such as wallows. When bison were reintroduced to the Konza Prairie Biological Station, Kansas, they reactivated relic wallows as well as created new ones. Wallows, like other ephemeral pools, may be used by organisms as aquatic habitat and as breeding sites. The objective of our study was to systematically monitor bison wallows after they filled and to ascertain their use by amphibians. We also examined long-term climatic records from the Konza Prairie area to assess the past viability of bison wallows as breeding habitats for anurans, which must complete metamorphosis before wallows dry. The amount of precipitation and cool temperatures required to prolong the hydroperiod necessary for completion of metamorphosis occurred in only about 20% of the years examined. Bison may have been important in the life histories of prairie anurans by creating “pools” in the form of wallows that could be used as breeding sites. However, more information about the life history of individual species of anurans is needed before viability of bison wallows as a breeding habitat can be determined.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1674/0003-0031(2003)150[0158:uobwba]2.0.co;2

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Black, 1976, P. Ok. Acad. Sci., 56, 1
  2. Busby, 1997, Southwest. Nat., 42, 210
  3. Wiggins, 1980, Arch. Hydrobiol./Suppl., 58, 97
  4. Williams, 1998, Arch. Hydrobiol. Spec. Issues. Advanc. Limnol., 52, 109

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 56

Metadata

Authors
GERLANC, N. M., & KAUFMAN, G. A.
Affiliations
Kansas State University (US)
Corresponding author
GERLANC, NICOLE M.
Venue
The American Midland Naturalist
Published
2003-07
Volume
150
Issue
1
Pages
158-168
ISSN
  • 0003-0031 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-4238
OpenAlex
W2125650924
Cited by
55
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Midland Naturalist (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Kansas
  • Nature Conservancy
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Keywords
Anura, amphibian breeding habitat, ephemeral ponds, hydroperiod, bison reintroduction, Konza Prairie, precipitation, temperature, metamorphosis, prairie grassland, soil disturbance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of bison wallows by anurans on Konza Prairie. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1674/0003-0031(2003)150%5B0158:uobwba%5D2.0.co;2
The paper
GERLANC, N. M., & KAUFMAN, G. A. (2003). Use of bison wallows by anurans on Konza Prairie. The American Midland Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031(2003)150%5B0158%3Auobwba%5D2.0.co%3B2